Kahibaro
Discord Login Register

Relationship Between the Equilibrium Constant and Standard Gibbs Free Energy Change

Connection Between Thermodynamics and Equilibrium

Chemical equilibrium (introduced in the parent chapter) can be described both:

This chapter explains how these two descriptions are linked mathematically and conceptually.

We will use the symbol $\Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ$ for the standard Gibbs free energy change of reaction and $K$ for the equilibrium constant defined using activities (or, in simple cases, appropriately scaled concentrations/partial pressures).

The Fundamental Relationship

For a reaction written in its stoichiometric form, for example

$$
\alpha\,\mathrm{A} + \beta\,\mathrm{B} \rightleftharpoons \gamma\,\mathrm{C} + \delta\,\mathrm{D},
$$

the key equation linking thermodynamics and equilibrium is

$$
\Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ = -\,RT \ln K
$$

where:

Equivalently,

$$
K = \exp\!\left( - \frac{\Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ}{RT} \right).
$$

These equations are only valid when:

Sign and Magnitude: What Do They Tell Us?

The sign and size of $\Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ$ give immediate qualitative information about the position of equilibrium, through the link to $K$.

Qualitative interpretation

Use the relation $\Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ = -RT\ln K$:

So:

Quantitative sense of size

Because the relation is exponential, small changes in $\Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ$ can lead to large changes in $K$.

At $T = 298\ \mathrm{K}$:

A useful approximation (at room temperature) is

$$
\Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ \mathrm{(kJ\,mol^{-1})} \approx -5.7\ \log_{10} K.
$$

So approximately:

In the other direction:

From Gibbs Free Energy of Reaction to the Equilibrium Constant

Gibbs free energy as a function of composition: reaction quotient

For a given mixture composition (not necessarily at equilibrium) the Gibbs free energy change of reaction is

$$
\Delta_\mathrm{r}G = \Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ + RT\ln Q
$$

where $Q$ is the reaction quotient constructed in the same way as $K$, but using current activities instead of equilibrium ones.

At equilibrium, $\Delta_\mathrm{r}G = 0$ (no net driving force in either direction), and $Q = K$. Substituting:

$$
0 = \Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ + RT\ln K
$$

which rearranges to

$$
\Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ = -RT\ln K.
$$

Thus, the link between $\Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ$ and $K$ is a direct consequence of:

Temperature Dependence

Both $\Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ$ and $K$ are functions of temperature, and their temperature dependencies are linked.

Using the fundamental relation

$$
\Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ = \Delta_\mathrm{r}H^\circ - T\Delta_\mathrm{r}S^\circ
$$

and combining it with

$$
\Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ = -RT\ln K
$$

gives

$$
-RT\ln K = \Delta_\mathrm{r}H^\circ - T\Delta_\mathrm{r}S^\circ.
$$

Rearranging:

$$
\ln K = -\frac{\Delta_\mathrm{r}H^\circ}{R}\,\frac{1}{T} + \frac{\Delta_\mathrm{r}S^\circ}{R}.
$$

If $\Delta_\mathrm{r}H^\circ$ and $\Delta_\mathrm{r}S^\circ$ are (approximately) constant over a modest temperature range, this shows that:

This linear relation (often called a van ’t Hoff plot) is one way to see how temperature changes the position of equilibrium, and it reflects the same underlying thermodynamic quantities that appear in $\Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ$.

Practical Use: Converting Between $\Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ$ and $K$

Because of the simple exponential relation, you can:

From tabulated data to $K$

  1. For the reaction of interest, compute

$$
\Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ = \sum_{\text{products}} \nu_i\,\Delta_\mathrm{f}G_i^\circ \;-\; \sum_{\text{reactants}} \nu_i\,\Delta_\mathrm{f}G_i^\circ,
$$

where $\nu_i$ are stoichiometric coefficients and $\Delta_\mathrm{f}G_i^\circ$ are standard Gibbs energies of formation.

  1. Insert this $\Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ$ into

$$
K = \exp\!\left( -\frac{\Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ}{RT} \right).
$$

From an experimental $K$ to $\Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ$

If $K$ is determined at temperature $T$:

$$
\Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ = -RT\ln K.
$$

This gives a standard thermodynamic description of the reaction based purely on equilibrium measurements.

Standard States and Dimensionless $K$

For the relationship $\Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ = -RT\ln K$ to be valid in its simple form, $K$ must be dimensionless and defined using activities $a_i$:

For the general reaction

$$
\sum_i \nu_i\,\mathrm{A}_i = 0
$$

the thermodynamic equilibrium constant is

$$
K = \prod_i a_i^{\nu_i},
$$

which is dimensionless by construction. When approximate expressions using concentrations or partial pressures are written as $K_c$ or $K_p$, they should be understood as shorthand for these activity-based, dimensionless quantities.

The standard Gibbs free energy change $\Delta_\mathrm{r}G^\circ$ always refers to these same standard states; the connection to $K$ assumes consistent definitions of the standard state on both sides of the equation.

Views: 18

Comments

Please login to add a comment.

Don't have an account? Register now!