Table of Contents
Looking Ahead in High Performance Computing
High performance computing is changing quickly. Systems are getting larger, more complex, and more diverse in both hardware and software. This chapter looks forward, not to teach you how to use specific tools today, but to help you recognize the directions in which HPC is moving. Understanding these trends will help you write software and design workflows that remain useful when systems evolve.
Here we focus on several connected themes. First, the move to exascale performance. Second, the close interaction between traditional simulation codes and artificial intelligence methods. Third, the growth of heterogeneous architectures that mix multiple kinds of processors. Fourth, the possible future role of quantum computing in HPC workflows. Throughout, the emphasis is on what these changes mean for you as a future HPC user or developer.
The Road to Exascale
Exascale computing refers to systems that can perform on the order of $10^{18}$ floating point operations per second, often written as 1 exaFLOP. This milestone is not only about raw speed. It is also about power consumption, programmability, and reliability at a scale far beyond earlier systems.
Characteristics of Exascale Systems
Exascale systems have several distinguishing features. They contain enormous numbers of cores, often organized into many levels of hierarchy. A single node can host dozens to thousands of CPU cores. In many systems, each node also contains one or more accelerators, such as GPUs, which add thousands of even smaller cores. The global system then links many such nodes together with high speed interconnects.
As a result, exascale machines are extremely parallel by necessity. To reach exascale performance, applications must exploit parallelism at many levels, from vector units and threads inside a core, to threads and processes across nodes, and often also to higher level task parallelism.
This level of parallelism introduces complexity in data movement. At exascale, the cost of moving data can dominate the cost of arithmetic operations. This cost exists both in time and energy. Future oriented designs try to minimize data movement, for example by using local memories close to compute units, and by enabling asynchronous overlapping of communication and computation.
Energy Constraints and Efficiency
Energy efficiency is a central constraint in exascale design. Power budgets are finite and cooling is expensive. It is not practical to scale previous architectures linearly to exascale levels without attention to energy.
This leads to a focus on performance per watt. Hardware designs choose simpler cores, heavily use accelerators, and integrate more specialized units, because these can perform more operations per joule than large general purpose cores.
From the software perspective, this means that algorithms and codes must be written with energy in mind. Reducing data movement, lowering communication overheads, and improving vectorization and locality all contribute to energy efficiency, not only to speed.
Future clusters will likely provide more tools to measure and control energy usage per job, such as power caps or per job energy reports. Application developers will need to consider not only time to solution, but also energy to solution as a core performance metric.
Resilience and Fault Tolerance at Scale
When a system has millions of components, failures become common. At exascale, mean time between component failures can be shorter than the runtime of a large simulation. Traditional checkpoint and restart approaches, which periodically save full application state to disk, can become too slow and too expensive in terms of I/O.
Future HPC software will require more sophisticated resilience strategies. These may include multi level checkpointing, where small frequent checkpoints are stored in local memory or node local storage and larger checkpoints are written less often to parallel filesystems. They may also include algorithm based fault tolerance, where the mathematical method itself can detect and correct some errors without full restart.
From a user perspective, this trend means that long running jobs must be designed to survive partial failures. It also means that future batch systems may report faults to applications in more detail, and application codes may contain internal recovery mechanisms.
Future exascale applications must optimize parallelism, data movement, and resilience together. Raw floating point speed alone will not guarantee useful performance.
AI and Machine Learning in HPC
Artificial intelligence and machine learning are now deeply intertwined with HPC. The same GPUs and accelerators that make exascale simulations possible also make large neural network training practical. At the same time, simulation and data driven methods are starting to combine in new workflows.
AI as a Workload on HPC Systems
Many modern HPC centers now support AI workloads alongside traditional simulations. Training large deep learning models can require large numbers of GPUs, high bandwidth memory, and high speed interconnects, all of which are already present in HPC facilities.
As a result, job schedulers at HPC centers increasingly need to handle new resource types, such as numbers and types of GPUs, and to support mixed precision computing where models use 16 bit or lower precision arithmetic. For users, this means that learning to request GPU resources and to use specialized AI frameworks becomes part of HPC practice.
AI workloads also change I/O patterns. Training often involves reading large datasets repeatedly. Future parallel filesystems and data management tools must support this efficiently, which can influence how data is stored, cached, and staged.
AI for Accelerating Simulation
AI is not only a workload, it is also a tool that can accelerate or augment simulations. Several patterns are emerging.
One pattern is the replacement of expensive components of a simulation with learned surrogate models. For example, a neural network might learn to approximate a complex physical process that is too expensive to solve directly at every timestep. This can reduce runtime significantly, while maintaining acceptable accuracy within certain ranges.
Another pattern is the use of AI for parameter exploration and optimization. Instead of running an enormous number of simulations with different parameters, one can combine simulations with active learning or Bayesian optimization methods that choose new simulation parameters based on previous results.
A third pattern is the integration of AI for tasks such as mesh refinement, timestep selection, or detection of interesting events in large scale data. These tasks can be triggered online during a simulation, which can reduce output size and guide the computation more intelligently.
Simulation Data and AI Models
HPC simulations generate large, high quality datasets. These datasets are increasingly used to train AI models. This creates a loop, where simulations produce data, AI learns from the data, and the trained models then assist or accelerate future simulations.
In practice, this requires attention to data formats, metadata, and reproducibility. Datasets must be documented so that AI practitioners can understand their content and provenance. There is also a need for shared data repositories that store simulation outputs in a way that supports both traditional analysis and AI training.
From a future user perspective, even if you work primarily on simulations, you should expect to interact with AI tools. You may use pretrained models as components of your code, or you may need to prepare your simulation outputs in ways that support downstream machine learning.
Future HPC workflows will blend simulation and AI, with simulations generating data for AI, and AI models guiding or accelerating simulations.
Heterogeneous Architectures
Heterogeneous architectures mix multiple types of compute units in one system. For example, a node can contain general purpose CPU cores, GPUs, vector engines, and sometimes other accelerators. This trend is already visible and will likely strengthen.
Motivations for Heterogeneity
Different workloads have different strengths. CPUs are flexible and handle complex control flow well. GPUs and similar accelerators handle regular, massively parallel computations efficiently. Specialized units such as tensor cores or matrix multiply accelerators can execute specific mathematical operations with very high throughput.
By combining these, hardware designers can improve performance per watt and overall system performance. For example, a simulation can use CPUs for irregular parts of the code, such as control logic and I/O, and offload large dense linear algebra operations to GPUs.
However, heterogeneity increases programming complexity. The programmer must decide which parts of the computation run where, how data moves between components, and how to overlap operations to hide communication latencies.
Memory and Data Movement on Heterogeneous Nodes
A key aspect of heterogeneous nodes is memory layout. Different components can have separate memories with different bandwidths and capacities. For example, GPUs often have high bandwidth memory with lower capacity than main memory, and accessing GPU memory from CPUs can be slower or require explicit data movement.
Newer systems introduce features such as high bandwidth memory attached to CPUs, unified virtual addressing, or coherent caches between CPUs and GPUs. These features can simplify programming, but they do not remove the cost of moving data.
Future oriented programming models will increasingly expose memory placement and data movement decisions, so that performance critical codes can manage them precisely. As a user, you will likely need to think about where your data lives, not only how much memory your job uses.
Programming Models for Heterogeneity
Several programming models aim to simplify heterogeneous programming. Some approaches are directive based, where you annotate code regions to run on accelerators and let the compiler and runtime handle details. Other approaches require explicit management of device kernels and memory transfers.
Looking ahead, there is a trend toward performance portability. This term refers to writing code that can run efficiently across different hardware types, without maintaining completely separate codebases. Libraries and frameworks that hide hardware differences behind common interfaces are part of this trend.
Yet complete portability without tradeoffs is difficult. Future HPC programmers will often need to balance portability with the desire to exploit specific hardware features fully. This means that understanding hardware characteristics remains important, even when abstract programming models exist.
Heterogeneous systems force applications to manage which computations run where, and how data moves between different kinds of processors.
Quantum Computing and HPC Integration
Quantum computing is still an emerging technology, but it is increasingly discussed in the context of HPC. It is unlikely to replace classical HPC systems in the near future. Instead, a more realistic scenario involves combined workflows where quantum devices act as accelerators for specific tasks.
Quantum Computers as Specialized Accelerators
Quantum computers excel, in theory, at particular types of problems. Examples include some optimization tasks, certain linear algebra operations, and specific simulation problems in quantum chemistry and materials science.
In an HPC context, this suggests hybrid workflows where a classical simulation or optimization loop runs on CPUs and GPUs, and calls a quantum device for carefully chosen subproblems. For example, a classical algorithm might delegate the solution of a small but hard quantum subsystem to a quantum computer.
From the point of view of a future HPC user, such a workflow would look similar to using an external accelerator. A job might run on an HPC cluster but communicate with a remote quantum device through network calls. Batch systems and resource schedulers would need to allocate not only classical resources but also time slices on quantum hardware.
Simulation of Quantum Systems on Classical HPC
Even before wide availability of large scale quantum computers, HPC plays a role in simulating quantum devices and quantum algorithms. Classical supercomputers can simulate quantum circuits up to certain sizes. This is useful for designing and validating quantum algorithms.
This work stresses classical HPC resources, particularly memory, because the size of the state space grows exponentially with the number of qubits. It also creates new software stacks that mix quantum programming languages or frameworks with classical simulation libraries.
Future HPC centers may offer both direct access to small quantum devices and large scale classical emulators. For users interested in quantum algorithms, learning to run hybrid classical and quantum simulations on HPC infrastructure will be a valuable skill.
Challenges of Integration
Integrating quantum computing into HPC involves several challenges. Error rates in quantum hardware are still high. Algorithms must be designed to tolerate noise or use error correction schemes, which can be resource intensive.
From a systems perspective, scheduling and security are nontrivial. Access to quantum hardware is scarce and expensive, so HPC centers must manage it carefully. Latency between classical and quantum components can also affect performance, which means that algorithms need to minimize the number of quantum calls or structure them efficiently.
Despite these challenges, many national and international initiatives are building combined HPC and quantum infrastructures. As these environments mature, typical HPC workflows may gain new options, where some parts of a computation run on quantum devices when beneficial.
Quantum computing will most likely augment, not replace, classical HPC, leading to hybrid workflows that combine classical and quantum resources.
Skills and Practices for a Changing HPC Landscape
As hardware and software ecosystems evolve, certain skills and habits will remain valuable or become even more important.
First, an understanding of parallelism at multiple levels will continue to be essential. Whether you use exascale CPUs, GPUs, or quantum accelerators, you will need to reason about concurrency, synchronization, and data dependencies.
Second, awareness of data movement and memory hierarchies will remain central. Future systems will likely introduce more memory levels and more options for data placement. Codes that minimize unnecessary data transfers will be more portable and energy efficient.
Third, adaptability in programming models will be important. New languages, libraries, and parallel frameworks will appear. Learning how to grasp new abstractions and map them onto underlying hardware will help keep your skills relevant. Knowledge of performance analysis tools will help you understand how your code behaves on unfamiliar architectures.
Finally, reproducibility and documentation will become more challenging but also more critical. As workflows combine simulations, AI, and possibly quantum components, capturing the full environment, dataset versions, and code paths becomes harder. Containers, environment modules, and workflow management tools will be part of the solution.
HPC is evolving toward larger scales, greater heterogeneity, and tighter integration with AI and emerging technologies. By focusing on core principles such as parallelism, locality, and careful measurement of performance, you can prepare to work effectively with systems that do not yet exist.